Short and Inconsequential

Honey Laundering

01.08.09 | No Comments

Out popped a dozen people in dark windbreakers identifying them as feds — agents from Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Some raced to the loading docks. Others hurried through the front door. All were armed.

“I just sell honey — what the hell is this all about?” he remembered asking, as he was hustled into a tiny room with his office manager and truck driver.

Three days before the April 25 raid, customs had persuaded a federal judge in Seattle to issue the search warrant shoved in Ingalls’ hands. But it wasn’t until Ingalls read “Attachment D” that he understood why investigators were seizing his business records, passport, phone logs, photographs, Rolodexes, mail and computer files — almost anything that could be copied or hauled away.

Honey Laundering: A sticky trail of intrigue and crime - Andrew Schneider

speak up

Add your comment below

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

:

:


« Can I borrow a cigarette?
» Lowery v. Motor Works
Copyright © 2007 Is It Obvious?. All rights reserved.
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AIM Conversations Announcement Audio Charity Design Doodles Flash Friends Friends of Friends General Important Inuit Jargon Lost and Found on My Hard Drive Musings Other Peoples Work Photography Press Short and Inconsequential Video Writing